Mar 03 10:30 <chen> Lets get started..

Mar 03 10:30 <chen> Starting with the release updates,

Mar 03 10:30 <chen> we had the stable release 2.28.3 this monday

Mar 03 10:31 <chen> had to make 2.28.3.1 since i sneaked in a debug patch by mistake..

Mar 03 10:31 <chen> we might need another release for evolution too to help windows build..

Mar 03 10:31 <chen> mbarnes, i heard that fredrich had spoken to you on the same ?

Mar 03 10:32 <chen> now coming to the most interesting stuffs which are going on,

Mar 03 10:33 <chen> we are working on polishing the UI for getting evolution into better shape for meego..

Mar 03 10:33 <chen> http://live.gnome.org/Evolution/Art has more information on the progress and stuffs planned..

Mar 03 10:33 <chen> abharath, lakhil have a look into it..

Mar 03 10:34 <chen> mbarnes, already knows about it..

Mar 03 10:34 <lakhil> sure

Mar 03 10:34 <chen> these are the items we are agressively working on upto hard-code freeze..

Mar 03 10:35 <chen> and michael has ported the GDbus branch into evolution code base,

Mar 03 10:35 <chen> changing the prefixes to e_dbus_*

Mar 03 10:36 <chen> we need to test that for checking on the stability..

Mar 03 10:36 <chen> abharath, will you be able to take that ?

Mar 03 10:36 <abharath> chen: sure. I'll sync up with you on this later

Mar 03 10:36 <chen> abharath, sure

Mar 03 10:37 <chen> apart from that more bug fixing until hard-code freeze :)

Mar 03 10:37 <chen> lets get on with status updates..

Mar 03 10:37 <chen> have been primarily working on imapx fixes..

Mar 03 10:38 <chen> now one can read multiple messages parallelly without blocking due to big attachments..

Mar 03 10:38 <chen> abharath, updates?

Mar 03 10:38 <abharath> chen: mostly on downstream bugs. nothing much

Mar 03 10:39 <chen> jonner, updates?

Mar 03 10:39 <chen> kov, anything to share?

Mar 03 10:39 <chen> lakhil, updates?

Mar 03 10:39 <lakhil> chen, mapi performance testing, little bit hands on imapx, bug triaging and sle stuff  

Mar 03 10:39 <chen> lakhil, thanks :)

Mar 03 10:39 <chen> mbarnes, updates?

Mar 03 10:41 <chen> next week then..

Mar 03 10:42 <chen> lakhil, abharath mbarnes catch u next week..

Mar 03 10:42 <lakhil> sure .. bye

Mar 03 10:42 *chen (~chen@ecoprobe-dmz.gns.novell.com) has left #evolution-meet

Mar 03 10:45 <mbarnes> gah!  I missed my turn

Mar 03 10:45 <mbarnes> you guys are fast

Mar 03 10:45 <abharath> haha

Mar 03 10:46 *chen (~chen@ecoprobe-dmz.gns.novell.com) has joined #evolution-meet

Mar 03 10:46 <chen> mbarnes, came back :)

Mar 03 10:46 <chen> mbarnes, u know how the time goes now :)

Mar 03 10:46 <abharath> aah chen back from the dead :)

Mar 03 10:47 *chen just suddenly realizes he is runnning out of disk space. oh bad

Mar 03 10:47 <chen> mbarnes, go on

Mar 03 10:47 <lakhil> chen, delete some movies which you had watched already :-P

Mar 03 10:47 <abharath> ok now I know why the office network is slow :)

Mar 03 10:48 <chen> lakhil, yeah checking for those now :D

Mar 03 10:48 <mbarnes> I've been stuck in a craft show booth for the past week with no Internet (long story)

Mar 03 10:48 <mbarnes> so I spent that time working on miscellaneous Evo 3.0 cleanup tasks

Mar 03 10:48 <mbarnes> this month I hope to help out with the "express" stuff as much as I can

Mar 03 10:48 <mbarnes> and also push hard on my branch to convert Camel to GObject

Mar 03 10:48 <mbarnes> I want to land that early in 2.31

Mar 03 10:49 <chen> mbarnes, camelo->gobject would be simply great :)

Mar 03 10:49 <chen> mbarnes, missing it for imapx very badly

Mar 03 10:50 <mbarnes> it would just Phase 1 -- I don't have the GIO integration done yet

Mar 03 10:50 <mbarnes> but it will set the stage

Mar 03 10:50 <chen> mbarnes,  btw,

Mar 03 10:50 <chen> on GIO integration,

Mar 03 10:50 <chen> will you be changing the internal implementation of CamelStream ?

Mar 03 10:51 <mbarnes> my ultimate goal is to kill CamelStream entirely

Mar 03 10:51 <mbarnes> but that's a ways out yet

Mar 03 10:51 <chen> mbarnes, oh that will mean rewrite in a all providers ?

Mar 03 10:52 <mbarnes> I would call it a substitution rather than a rewrite

Mar 03 10:52 <mbarnes> the providers shouldn't have to fundamentally change

Mar 03 10:53 <chen> mbarnes, ah ok that would be fine